Home/Calculators/Claude Token Calculator

Claude Token Calculator

Convert Claude token counts into cost and compare Opus, Sonnet, and Haiku for the same job.

CalculatorConvert tokens to cost · live workload estimate
Typical workloads
Estimate tokens from text
≈ 0 tokens

Rough estimate from character count; tokenizers vary by model, language, and content.

Cost by model
Selected model

Claude Sonnet 5.5

$0.70per request

$0.665 more than Claude Haiku 5.5 · 20.0× the cheapest

Model selection

Claude Sonnet 5.5: $2.00 input / $10.00 output per 1M tokens.

How this Claude Token Calculator works

How Claude counts tokens

Claude uses Anthropic's own tokenizer, so the same text tokenizes to a different count than GPT — don't assume a GPT estimate transfers. Claude Opus 4.7 and later models use a newer tokenizer that Anthropic says produces about 30% more tokens for the same text: roughly 555,000 English words per 1M tokens (about 2.5 characters per token), against about 750,000 words on Claude Sonnet 4.6 and earlier. Anthropic's free token-counting endpoint gives exact figures for the model you name. The system prompt and prior conversation are resent on every turn, so input grows as a session lengthens.

Choosing the right Claude model

The verified lineup includes Claude Fable 5.1 at the highest standard token price, Claude Opus 5.5 and Opus 4.7 for demanding reasoning and agentic work, Claude Sonnet 5.5 as the balanced production default, and Claude Haiku 5.5 for fast, inexpensive, high-volume tasks. Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Haiku 4.5 remain available on the older tokenizer. Output is priced above input on each tier, so generation-heavy features lean on output cost — switch models in the calculator above to compare the same workload.

Prompt caching and what's excluded

Anthropic's distinctive lever is prompt caching: reusing a large, stable prefix such as a long system prompt or reference document sharply cuts the input cost of repeated calls. This calculator uses standard uncached pricing, so caching-heavy workloads cost less than shown. It also excludes the Batch API, tool use, and Claude Haiku 5.5's higher rates for prompts over 100,000 tokens (other current Claude models bill their full context window at standard rates) — verify the real numbers in the Anthropic console.

Examples

Support assistant

Claude Sonnet 5.5 · 2,000 input / 500 output per reply. Balanced quality and price for production chat.

High-volume routing

Claude Haiku 5.5 · many short messages tagged and routed. Cheapest tier for simple, repetitive calls while prompts stay under 100K tokens.

Research agent

Claude Opus 5.5 · long shared context, detailed output. Prompt-cache the context to cut repeated input.

FAQ

Are these AI costs exact?

They are estimates based on public token prices. Your bill can change with cached tokens, batch discounts, image or audio usage, taxes, provider credits, and model-specific rules.

Which currency does the calculator use?

All calculators use USD by default because major AI providers publish API pricing in USD.

Do Claude and GPT count tokens the same way?

No. Anthropic and OpenAI use different tokenizers, so the same text can produce different token counts. Estimate Claude costs with Claude token counts rather than reusing a GPT figure.

How does prompt caching change the cost?

Anthropic can cache a stable prompt prefix so repeated requests reread it cheaply. For workloads that resend a large system prompt or document, real input cost can fall well below this standard-pricing estimate.

Which Claude model should I default to?

Sonnet is the common production balance of quality and price. Move up to Opus for genuinely hard reasoning, or down to Haiku for cheap, high-volume tasks.